首頁 提案手冊
FDE operating solutionProposed synthetic

Customer Refund-Status Inquiry

A proposed read-only operating solution for faster, safer customer-service responses

Refund-status inquiry only 8 minutes to 3 minutes AI-fit: not needed for the first slice Read-only; no write-back
artifacts/analysis-package.json C1: Proposed synthetic · C2: Refund-status inquiry only · C3: 8 minutes to 3 minutes · C5: AI-fit: not needed for the first slice · C6: Read-only; no write-back
DecisionProposed synthetic

The next decision is a bounded shadow replay

Decide whether to authorize a de-identified, read-only shadow replay of the deterministic first slice.

Standardize evidence and refund-state interpretation before adding technology; a deterministic read-only summary is sufficient for the first slice, so AI is not needed.

Customer-service operations lead · Finance refund owner
artifacts/analysis-package.json C1: Proposed synthetic · C3: 8 minutes to 3 minutes · C7: Customer-service operations lead · C8: Finance refund owner
Proposed diagnosisNot observed enterprise evidence

The likely delays happen before anyone writes the response

  1. 01Receive inquiry
  2. 02Find order
  3. 03Open payment system
  4. 04Inspect refund state
  5. 05Compose response
  6. 06Confirm response with customer
proposed

Cross-system lookup

The representative switches context and reconstructs evidence before answering.

proposed

Manual state interpretation

Source-specific refund states must be translated into customer-safe language during every inquiry.

proposed

Exceptions are discovered late

Missing, conflicting, stale, prohibited, or unauthorized cases consume handling time before escalation.

proposed

Prose composition is not the primary delay

Automating language first would leave the evidence and semantic bottlenecks intact.

artifacts/analysis-package.json C1: Proposed synthetic · C2: Refund-status inquiry only
Target workflowProcess before technology

Standardize evidence before human confirmation

  1. 01

    Retrieve

    Resolve permitted order and payment evidence with source identity and retrieval time.

    Deterministic software
  2. 02

    Control

    Evaluate record presence, consistency, freshness, dispute status, and access.

    Deterministic software
  3. 03

    Normalize

    Map only one of the three supported states using finance-owned versioned rules.

    Deterministic software
  4. 04

    Confirm

    Review the evidence-bearing summary and confirm or reject the response template.

    Customer-service representative
  5. 05

    Escalate

    Resolve every abstained, disputed, failed, rejected, stale, conflicting, missing, or unauthorized case.

    Finance refund owner

An explicit abstention with a finance escalation reason.

artifacts/analysis-package.json C2: Refund-status inquiry only · C6: Read-only; no write-back · C7: Customer-service operations lead · C8: Finance refund owner
Intervention selectionSimplest sufficient choice

Stable work stays deterministic; accountable judgment stays human

Evidence spread across systems

Read-only evidence aggregation

Retrieval and provenance assembly are stable and testable.

Deterministic software
Source-specific refund states

Versioned deterministic mapping

The supported state set is closed and identical inputs must produce identical outcomes.

Deterministic software with finance policy ownership
Unsafe or ambiguous cases

Abstention and finance escalation

The first slice must not infer policy or conceal missing evidence.

Deterministic routing plus human judgment
Customer response

Response template for human confirmation

A template is sufficient; direct automation would exceed the proposed authority.

Customer-service representative
artifacts/analysis-package.json C5: AI-fit: not needed for the first slice · C6: Read-only; no write-back
AI decisionProposed synthetic

AI-fit: not needed for the first slice

Retrieval, state mapping, access checks, exception rules, and response templates are deterministic. Adding AI would not remove the diagnosed bottleneck.

Evaluate AI later only for measurable language or wording value after the deterministic shadow baseline is accepted; AI may not map states, fill missing evidence, answer customers directly, or authorize an action.

artifacts/analysis-package.json C1: Proposed synthetic · C5: AI-fit: not needed for the first slice
Semantic contractVersion refund-status-semantics@0.1.0-proposed

Only three refund states are supported

SUPPORTED

Refund not initiated

No refund initiation is evidenced for the order.

Present read-only summary for human confirmation.
SUPPORTED

Refund processing

Refund initiation is evidenced and completion is not yet evidenced.

Present read-only summary for human confirmation.
SUPPORTED

Refund completed

Refund completion is evidenced by the permitted payment source.

Present read-only summary for human confirmation.

Everything else abstains and routes to finance

  • Missing records
  • Conflicting states
  • Stale data
  • Failed refunds
  • Rejected refunds
  • Payment disputes
  • Insufficient access
  • Any unsupported state
artifacts/analysis-package.json C4: Refund not initiated | Refund processing | Refund completed · C8: Finance refund owner
First buildable sliceHuman confirmation required

Read-only refund summary

A customer-service representative receives one evidence-bearing summary or a finance escalation, then confirms the response.

Every result exposes

  • Normalized refund status or abstention
  • Source evidence
  • Retrieval time
  • Semantic-definition version
  • Freshness status
  • Access decision
  • Response template or escalation reason

Explicitly deferred

  • Enterprise source integration
  • Identity and authorization integration
  • Persistent telemetry
  • Direct customer response
  • AI wording assistance
  • Refund approval or compensation
  • Write-back

Read-only; no write-back · Human confirmation required · Enterprise access decision: missing

artifacts/analysis-package.json C2: Refund-status inquiry only · C5: AI-fit: not needed for the first slice · C6: Read-only; no write-back
Validation gateShadow before pilot

De-identified historical shadow replay

V1

Supported-state mapping

100% mapping for Refund not initiated, Refund processing, and Refund completed

V2

Abstention

100% of missing, conflicting, stale, failed, rejected, disputed, unauthorized, and unsupported cases abstain

V3

Handling time

Average simulated handling time <= 3 minutes

V4

Evidence contract

Every result exposes source evidence, retrieval time, semantic version, freshness, and access decision

V5

Response quality

Incorrect refund-status responses do not increase against an accepted baseline

V6

Owner acceptance

Both named owner roles accept the shadow result

Rollback: Remove the support view from the shadow workflow and return to the current inquiry process. No business-system compensation is required because the slice performs no write-back.

artifacts/analysis-package.json C3: 8 minutes to 3 minutes · C4: Refund not initiated | Refund processing | Refund completed · C6: Read-only; no write-back
Next accountable actionNot a pilot authorization

Run a process-and-semantics acceptance session, then authorize a de-identified shadow replay only if the entry criteria are met.

  1. 01Observed current normal, exception, escalation, and rework paths
  2. 02Accepted handling-time and response-quality baselines
  3. 03Finance-owned state and exception definitions
  4. 04Source, identity, access, freshness, privacy, and retention decisions
  5. 05Authorized de-identified replay set
Both owners sign an acceptance record that names the target flow, semantic version, thresholds, evidence access, and shadow boundary.

Owners: Customer-service operations lead · Finance refund owner

← → / Space · Home / End · F fullscreen · P print
1 / 10